On Wednesday 4th September 2024, the Grenfell Tower Inquiry published its Phase 2 Report into the circumstances leading up to and surrounding the fire at Grenfell Tower on 14th June 2017, which resulted in the deaths of 72 people.
A damning report

 

The 1700 pages report highlights failures by the government, local authorities, contractors, and manufacturers, citing incompetence, dishonesty, and greed. According to the inquiry chair, Sir Martin Moore-Bick, those named in the report bear different degree of responsibility for the disaster, yet each contributed to the tragedy in one way or another.

Considering the thorough assessment of failings involved and the extent of recommendations provided in the report, it seems fair to assume that significant changes to legislation will follow; however, since it took 7 years for the final report to be published, it is unlikely this will happen very soon.

 

An avoidable tragedy

 

 

The deaths of the 72 people in the Grenfell Tower fire were deemed avoidable, with multiple parties failing in their responsibilities over the years.

 

Amongst those identified to have failed in their responsibilities are:

  • The Government (successive governments);
  • The National House Building Council (NHBC);
  • Local Authority Building Control (LABC);
  • The London Fire Brigade (LFB);
  • The Building Research Establishment (BRE);
  • The United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS);
  • The Tenant Management Organisation (TMO);
  • The British Board of Agrément (BBA);
  • Manufacturers such as Arconic, Kingspan, Celotex, and Siderise;
  • Contractors involved in Grenfell`s refit, including Studio E (architect), Rydon (principal contractor) and Harley Facades (sub-contractor); and
  • The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC).

Key Findings

 

The key findings of the report include, amongst others:

  • failure of successive governments to act, despite experts raising an alarm about cladding fires as early as 1992, after the Knowsley Heights fire in Huyton, Merseyside;
  • serious deficiencies in the management of building safety in England and Wales;
  • manufacturer Arconic concealed the true extent of the danger of using its product, the Reynobond 55 cladding;
  • ‘systematic dishonesty’ of those who made and sold the cladding, including Arconic, Celotex and Kingspan;
  • privatisation of The Building Research Establishment (BRE), which exposed it to ‘unscrupulous product manufacturers’;
  • indifference to fire safety by the Tenant Management Organisation (TMO), including in relation to handling complaints, remedying defects identified in fire risk assessments, installing and maintaining fire protection systems and routine inspection and maintenance of fire doors;
  • poor management of Grenfell` refit by both contractors and the TMO.
  • failures of the London Fire Brigade around staff training as well as lack of a strategy to evacuate the building; and
  • inappropriate fire testing regime, including the use of ‘Class 0’ as a standard of fire performance for products to be used on the external wall of tall buildings.

Recommendations


The final report includes almost 60 recommendations, many of which are focused on the construction industry.

The key recommendations include:

  • the appointment of a single construction regulator, in control of all aspects of the construction industry;
  • a review of the definition of higher-risk building, taking into consideration not only the height threshold but other factors such as vulnerability of residents;
  • bringing responsibility for all aspects of fire safety (currently delivered by multiple Government departments) under one department and a single secretary of state;
  • a licensing scheme for principal contractors wishing to undertake the construction or refurbishment of higher-risk buildings;
  • regulation and compulsory accreditation of fire risk assessors;
  • recognition and protection by law of the fire engineering profession and the establishment of an independent body to regulate it;
  • the Government to make it clear that BS 9414 should not be used as a substitute for an assessment by a suitably qualified fire engineer.
  • a statutory requirement that a fire safety strategy produced by a registered fire engineer to be submitted with building control applications (at Gateway 2) for the construction or refurbishment of any higher-risk building and for it to be reviewed and re-submitted at the stage of completion (Gateway 3);
  • the establishment of a College of Fire and Rescue with sufficient resources to provide training and education services to fire and rescue services nationally;
  • the establishment of a Chief Construction Advisor to provide advice on matters affecting the construction industry;
  • a review of the building control functions;
  • product manufacturers to provide all relevant test results that support fire safety claims; full history of tests – including failures – to be included in product certificates;
  • the review of Approved Document B, followed by a revised version as soon as possible;
  • the current guidance on preparing for emergencies, currently contained in several documents, to be revised and consolidated in one document.

The Inquiry panel also recommends that the Government should maintain a record of recommendations made by public inquiries and select committees, describing the steps taken in response to or the reason for not accepting a recommendation, and report annually to parliament. The record should be publicly accessible.

 

Over the course of Phase 1 and Phase 2, the Grenfell Tower Inquiry (opened in September 2017) has disclosed over 320,000 documents, took over 1600 witness statements and held more than 300 public hearings. The investigation revealed failures by the government, local authorities, contractors, and manufacturers and provided an extensive list of recommendations which aim to ensure tragedies like the Grenfell fire will never repeat.

The participant in this article has chosen to remain anonymous and will be referred to as Emily for the purposes of this story.


Last year, Emily was referred to our charity’s Restart Scheme by the Job Centre with the hope of finding part-time, sustainable employment.


At the time, Emily was studying at college, attending four days a week while completing a course in Media Hair and Make-up.


As a single mother to her 7-year-old daughter, Emily faced childcare challenges. Her daughter’s school didn’t offer an after-school club, and her daughter was uncomfortable with a childminder. This prompted Emily to consider self-employment as a solution, offering her the flexibility to balance work and childcare.


Equipped with a driver’s license, her own transport, and an updated CV, Emily was ready to explore new opportunities. During their conversations, Emily revealed that she had been managing anxiety. With this in mind, Gemma offered her information about accessing a mentor through Newground Together for additional support. Emily was grateful for the suggestion and agreed to consider reaching out should she require extra guidance.


After completing her college course in July 2023, Emily began focusing on finding a more stable job. Having worked as a Wellbeing Worker and Healthcare Assistant before, she naturally leaned towards exploring opportunities in similar fields. Gemma, always supportive, recommended the Aspire Education Course, which equips people for roles in school support. Emily decided to give it a go, and after finishing the course, she immediately started searching for teaching assistant and school support positions through specialised recruitment agencies.


Alongside Gemma’s support, Emily also received guidance from the employer engagement officer, who helped her find job vacancies that suited her childcare needs. Together, they identified a position at East Lancashire Hospice, and with Gemma’s assistance, Emily successfully navigated the application process.


After her interview, Emily was delighted to be offered the role of Healthcare Assistant and started working at East Lancashire Hospice in January 2024. To help make the transition smoother, she received financial support to cover her travel expenses until her first pay came through.


Now, she’s thriving in her new job, successfully balancing both her career and family responsibilities.

Jurisdiction: Republic of Ireland

Commencement: 1st October 2024

Amends: Road Traffic Acts 1961 – 2024


Mini Summary

The Road Traffic Act 1961 applies to vehicles on public roads.


General requirements for vehicles

Part 2 sets out the general requirements for vehicles including maximum allowable weights, the requirement to weigh certain vehicles, vehicle permits, the requirement to test vehicles, and the powers of the Garda Síochána to examine, inspect and test vehicles.


Driving licences

Part 3 sets out information on the application, granting of and disqualification of driving licences. It also covers certificates of competency.


Speed limits

Part 4 outlines the speed limits that can be applied to public roads.


Offences

Part 5 sets out a series of driving offences. It is an offence to:

  • drive a vehicle when suffering from a disease (mental or physical) that diminishes the driver’s capacity to drive, or makes them a danger to others;
  • drive under the influence of an intoxicant (alcohol or drugs) to the extent they have improper control of the vehicle;
  • drive without due care and attention, or without reasonable consideration for others using that space;
  • drive at a speed or a manner in which is dangerous to the public;
  • drive when they are aware that a vehicular defect may make the vehicle a danger to the public; and
  • park in a manner that will likely cause danger to others.

Compulsory insurance of mechanically propelled vehicles

Part 6 sets out the obligation for drivers to be insured when driving a vehicle on a public road.


Control and Operation of Public Service Vehicles

Part 7 allows the Minister for Local Government (‘the Minister’) to make regulations concerning the control and operation of public service vehicles*.

*A public service vehicle is any vehicle used to transport a person for reward (i.e. payment).


Regulation of traffic

Part 8 establishes rules for the regulation and control of traffic and pedestrians in public places. This includes traffic signs and the prohibition of traffic from using footways.


Penalties

Part 9 sets out notices and penalties for committing an offence. It also sets limits for continuous driving.

 

Amendment

From 1st October 2024, the time period within which a vehicle insurer has to notify the Minister when a vehicle is a danger to the public when in motion, or is beyond repair, is increased from 5 working days to 10 working days. 

 

The Legislation Update Service is the best way to stay up to date automatically with legislation in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.

Sign up for your free trial to get instant access.

 

 

Jurisdiction: Wales

Commencement: 3rd June 2024

Amends:

  • Harbours Act 1964
  • Highways Act 1980
  • Electricity Act 1989
  • Town and Country Planning Act 1990
  • Planning (Hazardous Substances) Act 1990
  • New Roads and Street Works Act 1991
  • Transport and Works Act 1992
  • Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004
  • Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009
  • Flood and Water Management Act 2010
  • Planning (Wales) Act 2015
  • Infrastructure Act 2015
  • Housing and Planning Act 2016
  • Historic Environment (Wales) Act 2023

Mini Summary

A regime is introduced for granting consent for significant infrastructure projects in Wales. Infrastructure consent must be obtained for specific types of ‘significant infrastructure projects’, including both onshore and offshore infrastructure.

Summary
A unified consent process is in place for a wide range of significant infrastructure types (both onshore and offshore) in Wales.


The significant infrastructure project types covered by this new consenting process are listed below, with links to definitions that determine when such an infrastructure project type would be classified as ‘significant’.

N.B. Only those infrastructure types above that meet the specific criteria to be classed as a ‘significant’ infrastructure project are within the scope of this Act.

 

Duties

Various duties apply.


 

The Legislation Update Service is the best way to stay up to date automatically with legislation in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.

Sign up for your free trial to get instant access.

 

 

Jurisdiction: Wales

Commencement: 15th July 2024

Amends: Agriculture (Wales) Act 2023
Mini Summary

The Agriculture (Wales) Act 2023 established a framework to ensure that land management in Wales is sustainable.

As part of this framework, 4 key objectives have been established.

  1. To ensure that food and goods are produced sustainably.
  2. To mitigate and adapt to climate change.
  3. To maintain and enhance the resilience of ecosystems*.
  4. To conserve and maintain public access and engagement with the countryside.

*Ecosystem resilience refers to:

  • the diversity of ecosystems;
  • the connectivity of ecosystems;
  • the adaptability of ecosystems; and
  • the condition of ecosystems and habitats.

Duties
There are no duties for organisations; duties are held by the Welsh Ministers.

 

Amendment

Section 24 (Agricultural Holdings: dispute resolution relating to financial support) is brought into force on 15th July 2024.


This amendment has no direct environmental relevance.


 

The Legislation Update Service is the best way to stay up to date automatically with legislation in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.

Sign up for your free trial to get instant access.

 

 

Jurisdiction: Republic of Ireland

Commencement: 1st July 2024

Amends: Waste Management (Food Waste) Regulations 2009
Mini Summary

The Waste Management (Food Waste) Regulations 2009 are designed to promote the segregation and recovery of food waste arising from the commercial sector. They aim to increase the amount of food waste that is recovered in Ireland.


The requirements apply to the following classes of business where food is prepared or supplied on the premises.

 

  • Class 1: Premises used for the supply of hot food for consumption both on and off the premises, including premises where the supply of food is secondary to any other commercial or retail activity.
  • Class 2: A public house where food is supplied which has been prepared in a kitchen or catering facility.
  • Class 3: Premises where food supplied to employees, including premises which are used for industrial, commercial or trade activities as well as office buildings and mixed-use premises.
  • Class 4: A guest house, hostel or hotel of four or more bedrooms, providing overnight guest accommodation.
  • Class 5: A shop or supermarket involved in the sale of food to the public, including the sale of sandwiches or hot food where the sale of food is secondary to the main retail use.
  • Class 6: A restaurant, café, bistro, wine bar.
  • Class 7: A hospital, nursing home or other premises for the long term residential accommodation for people in need of care.
  • Class 8: An institution providing adult education, a school, college or training centre, or a university or any other third-level or higher-level institution.
  • Class 9: State buildings.
  • Class 10: Canteen services where food is prepared or supplied to employees which is situated on a construction site where the duration of work exceeds 9 months.
  • Class 11: Stations, airports, ports, harbours and marinas where trains, planes, and boats which engage in the supply of food to the public (other than food waste originating from means of transport operating internationally) unload food waste from the transportation medium.

N.B. Mobile food outlets, such as vans and caravans are exempt from these requirements.


Duties
Various duties apply and are available to view on The Legislation Update Service.

 

Amendment

All commercial premises (other than those specifically exempted) are obligated to segregate their food waste, so that bio-waste is either separated and recycled at source, or is collected separately, and is not mixed with other types of waste.


Schedule 1 is deleted to reflect these changes.


 

The Legislation Update Service is the best way to stay up to date automatically with legislation in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.

Sign up for your free trial to get instant access.

 

 

With 100% of our business profits going directly to charitable causes through our parent charity, we spotlight a specific area of impact each month.

This month, we focus on how our charity’s Multiply programme, funded by your support, has helped Sam.

Sam was referred to the Multiply programme by his Employment & Skills (E&S) advisor to improve his maths skills. Being autistic and experiencing anxiety, he initially had very low confidence in speaking to others. He often spoke in whispers, hid behind his hand, wore a hat, and displayed signs of nervous anxiety.

When it came to meeting Sam for the first time, our team immediately worked out the best approach was short-term, one-on-one support sessions, specifically in maths. Over time, our charity began to build trust with Sam, using football as a way to break down communication barriers. As Sam began to open up, his self-awareness improved and his anxiety lessened.

Sam’s commitment and the personalised support he received resulted in remarkable progress in his maths skills. By December 2023, he successfully earned his Level 1 Maths qualification with an outstanding score. Although his participation in the Restart programme had concluded by then, Sam’s confidence had increased so much that he started contemplating employment.

But our charity didn’t want to stop there. Recognising Sam’s potential, they didn’t want to just stop supporting him. Therefore, the team introduced Sam to another one of our charity’s programmes, Next Steps Together (NST).

The NST programme gave Sam the opportunity to undertake an accredited employability course, where during the sessions, his confidence began to grow. Remarkably, Sam gave a short presentation as part of the course, a huge milestone for Sam considering the initial anxiety and reluctance to speak.

His previous Restart Advisor noted the dramatic transformation, barely recognising the new, more confident Sam.

Following a successful completion of the employability course, Sam went on to earn another qualification. Sam then took the leap and enrolled in an accredited ICT course. He is now finalising his portfolio for this course, which will earn him yet another qualification.

We’re so pleased to see the change in Sam and the impact our charity has had on him. Without your support, we really couldn’t do any of this.

Today, Sam demonstrates humour, increased confidence, and a positive outlook on his future. His journey from a nervous, withdrawn individual to a confident, proactive participant in various programmes highlights the transformative impact of personalised support and encouragement.

The Automated Vehicles Act 2024 (AV Act) received Royal Assent on 20th May 2024, paving the way for future laws allowing the use of fully automated vehicles on British roads.


The AV Act provides the framework to enable the use of advanced vehicle technology, with the Government expecting that self-driving vehicles could be permitted on public roads from 2026, improving both road safety and the economy.


The Act provides a framework of general requirements, as such, it is expected that the Secretary of State will introduce additional regulations over the next couple of years to establish specific requirements for:

  • authorising the use of automated features; and
  • licencing the operation of automated vehicles.

The Act is extensive, considering both occupied and unoccupied vehicles, as well as the use of automated vehicles for passenger services, introducing terms such as:

  • ‘user-in-charge’ referring to a person in a vehicle driving in an automated mode, who has the power to control it manually; and
  • ‘licenced no-user-in-charge operator’ referring to a person licensed to oversee journeys completed by automated vehicles.

Improving road safety is a huge part of the rationale behind the use of automated vehicles. Government data reveals that there were over 330,000 road traffic accidents on British roads in 2022, resulting in 1711 fatalities and over 135,000 casualties.


The Occupational Road Safety Alliance estimates that 94% of road traffic accidents are caused by human error, so the use of technology to minimise human error could significantly reduce the level of harm posed by vehicles.


The use of automated features under the AC Act will only be authorised where they are tested, and approved, as meeting safety requirements and perform to a level equivalent to that of a careful and competent driver.


Vehicles form an integral part of the British economy, it’s estimated that there are over 41 million licensed vehicles on roads across the UK, of which 5 million are commercial vehicles. Factoring in the millions of people that also use their own vehicles to commute, or as work vehicles (grey fleet), in addition to the use of public road transport and taxis, the impact of automated vehicles over the next decade could be a true inflection point for road transport.


The use of automated vehicles also presents potential environmental benefits through journey optimisation and efficiency, reducing traffic congestion and minimising traffic jams following driver-error accidents. Alongside the movement towards less polluting vehicles, the environmental and public health benefits of a transition to the use of automated vehicles could be significant.


Previously a distant reality, we have seen vehicle manufacturers take huge steps over the past decade in introducing driver assistance and automation features in vehicles, which will support the transition to fully automated vehicles. The EU has already introduced requirements for advanced vehicle safety features such as intelligent speed assistance, emergency braking systems which detect other vehicles and road users, and emergency lane-keeping systems.


Whilst the AV Act is a very significant step towards the widespread use of automated vehicles, it will require a multitude of additional regulations to be introduced before we see truly driverless vehicles on roads. The Government has confirmed consultations on the use of automated vehicles will be held throughout 2024 and 2025, however it remains to be seen whether this is impacted by the 2024 UK General Election and future Government commitments.


You can view the entry for the AC Act on the Legislation Update Service here, we will be including updates on consultations and regulations published in support of the Act over the foreseeable future on LUS and recommend keeping an eye out for developments.


Alternatively, non-subscribers can view the full legislation here.

When products are made available or distributed in the UK or EU they must comply with relevant quality, safety, environmental and technical standards. For some products, this requires a product conformity assessment (PCA) and marking to validate that the product is compliant with applicable standards and legislation.

The main application and requirements relating to product conformity assessments and labelling are summarised below.

 

Conformity Assessments

 

Manufacturers can perform their own PCA for some products, but higher-risk or safety-critical products require assessment by an independent conformity assessment body (CAB) authorised by the relevant jurisdiction.

Product categories which require independent assessment include:

  • Machinery;
  • Pressure equipment;
  • Radio equipment; and
  • Toys.

In addition, ecodesign requirements (such as minimum energy efficiency and emission limits) apply to some products such as lighting, electrical devices and heating or cooling equipment. Likewise, certain construction products must meet designated standards.

 

Key Duties for Product Conformity

 

The main duties for product conformity lie with the product’s manufacturer or importer who must ensure that:

  • The product has been assessed as meeting all required standards;
  • Technical documentation and a signed declaration of conformity are in place; and
  • Appropriate labelling and product information is provided with a product.

Distributors also play a key role and are required to:

  • Ensure manufacturers and importers have complied with their duties; and
  • Report any compliance issues to the relevant authority.

Product Labelling

 

Products which require conformity assessment must be clearly labelled with:

  • Marking confirming the product’s conformity; and
  • Details of the organisation responsible for the product in the market available.

The main conformity markings and the products and markets to which they apply are outlined in the table below:

 European UnionNorthern IrelandGreat Britain
Products requiring safety, health and environmental conformityCECE; or
UKNI and CE
UKCA; or
CE; or
UKNI and CE
Aerosol dispensers and measuring container bottles3 (reversed epsilon)UKCA; or
3 (reversed epsilon)
Transportable pressure equipmentπ (Pi)P (Rho)

 

image (2)

 

N.B. When the UK left the EU it was planned that CE and 3 (reversed epsilon marking) would be replaced by UKCA marking for the GB market. In 2023 it was announced that CE marking and 3 marking will be accepted indefinitely for products placed on the GB market. However, π (Pi) marking has been replaced by P (Rho) for transportable pressure equipment placed on the GB market.

 

Conformity marking is required for products where relevant health, safety and environmental requirements exist. A product must comply with all relevant requirements in order for conformity marking to be applied. Products requiring safety, health and environmental conformity assessment and labelling are listed in the table below.

 

Products Requiring Safety, Health and Environmental Conformity in the EU / NIProducts Requiring Safety, Health and Environmental Conformity in GB
ToysToys
Pressure equipmentPyrotechnics
Electrical and electronic equipmentRecreational craft and personal watercraft
Construction productsSimple pressure vessels
PyrotechnicsElectromagnetic compatibility
Recreational craft and personal watercraftNon-automatic weighing instruments
ExplosivesMeasuring instruments
Simple pressure vesselsMeasuring container bottles*
Electromagnetic compatibilityLifts
Non-automatic weighing instrumentsEquipment for potentially explosive atmospheres (UKEX)
Measuring instrumentsRadio equipment
LiftsPressure equipment
Radio equipmentPersonal protective equipment (PPE)
Marine equipmentGas appliances
Cableway installationsMachinery
PPEEquipment for use outdoors
Gas appliancesAerosol dispensers*
Medical devicesLow voltage electrical equipment
Fertilisers 
Drones 
Batteries 
Machinery 

 

*Aerosol dispensers and measuring container bottles can use either UKCA or the EU’s 3 (reversed epsilon) marking for the GB market.

 

The British Standards Institution’s Kitemark cannot be used to demonstrate legal conformity but is commonly used to indicate a product, including safety-critical equipment, has been independently tested and verified as meeting quality, safety and sustainability standards.

 

Harmonised and Designated Standards

 

The UK Government and European Commission have published a range of standards to help organisations ensure that their products conform with requirements. It isn’t a legal requirement for manufacturers to apply the relevant standard to a product, but by doing so this will often be enough to demonstrate that their product is legally compliant.

EU and GB standards can be accessed using the links below:

Additional information

 

Additional guidance on conformity assessment and labelling can be accessed using the links below:

The 31st July 2024 marks the 50th anniversary of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act (HSWA). We look back at its role in making UK workplaces some of the safest in the world and why it remains as the country’s single most important piece of occupational health and safety law.
Background
By 1974, attempts to overhaul workplace health, safety and welfare in the UK were long overdue. Existing legislation was inconsistent and only applied to specific sectors and industries such as factories, agriculture, mines and quarries, leaving millions of workers with no legal health and safety protection in their workplace.

The Employed Persons (Health and Safety) Bill had been proposed in 1970, the same year the USA passed the Occupational Safety and Health Act into federal law, but concerns that that the Bill did not address key issues meant it would be another 4 years until the Act as we know it became law, following a committee of inquiry and the Robens Report being published in 1972.

HSWA introduced:

HSWA today
The HSE’s public register of convictions shows that during the past 12 months breaches of HSWA was involved in well over half of successful prosecutions and resulted in 8 of the 10 highest fines issued, of which all were at least £1 million.

At the heart of HSWA’s ongoing relevance is its simplicity in applying general duties to protect people. The most common section of HSWA breached resulting in prosecution and conviction is 2(1):

‘It shall be the duty of every employer to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees.’

Beyond the use of outdated gender-specific language in reference to an employer, the wording of duties under HSWA has been key to its ongoing effectiveness. The general duty to protect workers under section 2(1):

‘So far as is reasonably practicable’ requires that the level of effort in protecting workers (and others through wider duties) is proportionate to the level of risk of harm, i.e. it would be expected that employers invest more time and money in controlling hazards where the level of risk is higher.

Unlike in other criminal prosecutions where a defendant may be presumed innocent until proven guilty, where there is a breach of duty under HSWA, it is up to the defendant to prove they fulfilled their duty in a way that was reasonably practicable.
The Future
There have been discussions over the years about modernising the Act, in particular some of the wording, but it’s not expected that the new UK Government will look to overhaul an Act which continues to be as effective today as when it was passed by a new UK Government 50 years ago.
About The Compliance People
The Compliance People provide tools, support and advice, helping organisations manage their environment, health & safety and quality compliance obligations. As a social enterprise, all of our profits are donated to charity for the benefit of communities and environments around us.